nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 03, v.27 285-291
“金课”视域下教师教育课程思政建设探索与实践
基金项目(Foundation): 云南省教育厅科学研究基金项目(2025J1053); 普洱学院教学成果培育项目(2023JXCGPYZD007)
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
摘要:

教育部针对高校课程思政建设提出的要求使得教师教育课程改革面临新形势,将金课作为发展目标,加强教师教育课程思政建设,使其从更全面、更高阶的角度重构教师教育课程思政方式、内容等。“金课”视域下,加强教师教育课程思政建设,有助于促进立德树人根本任务的高效落实,突出各高校、各专业的办学特色,进一步提升教师职业素养,为金课建设奠定基础。但当前高校教师教育课程思政建设存在课程思政认识模糊、思政元素挖掘不深、教学评价创新不足、协同机制有待完善等问题,对此,文章基于金课建设需求,从教育理念更新、教学内容优化、评价体系构建、协同机制建设等多角度入手,完善教师教育课程思政体系,以充分发挥课程思政金课建设在教师教育专业高质量发展中的重要作用。

Abstract:

The requirements of the Ministry of Education for the ideological and political construction of college courses have made the reform of teacher education curriculum face a new situation, and the golden course is taken as the development goal to strengthen the ideological and political construction of teacher education courses, which can reconstruct the ideological and political methods and contents of teacher education courses from a more comprehensive and higherlevel perspective. From the perspective of "golden course", strengthening the ideological and political construction of teacher education courses is conducive to promoting the efficient implementation of the fundamental task of cultivating morality, which can highlight the characteristics of running schools in colleges and universities, further improving the professional quality of teachers, and laying the foundation for the construction of golden courses. However, there are some problems in the current ideological and political construction of teacher education courses in colleges and universities, such as the vague understanding of curriculum ideology and politics, the lack of deep excavation of ideological and political elements, the lack of innovation in teaching evaluation, and the need to improve the coordination mechanism. The construction of the golden courses needs a well-developed ideological and political education system in teacher education,including the update of educational concepts, the optimization of teaching content, the construction of evaluation systems,and the building of collaborative mechanisms, which can fully leverage the important role of ideological and political "golden course" development in the high-quality advancement of teacher education programs.

参考文献

[1]杨祥,王强,高建.课程思政是方法不是“加法”[J].中国高等教育,2020(8):4-5.

[2]董小梅,钭利珍.高校思政课社会实践“金课”建设路径研究[J].教育学术月刊,2021(7):98-103.

[3]陈磊,沈扬,黄波.课程思政建设的价值方向、现实困境及其实践超越[J].学校党建与思想教育,2020(14):51-53.

[4]单俊宇,唐红霞.坚持守正创新打造新时代思政课“金课”[J].教育发展研究,2023,43(5):封2.

[5]蔡满园.“课程思政”视域下大学英语金课的创意理性及实践路向[J].外语电化教学,2022(1):3-7.

[6]薄萌萌.高校教师在“课程思政”改革中的元认知过程[J].教育学术月刊,2020(4):68-74.

[7]谢桂新,陈伟.教育学类专业课程思政教学评价略探[J].学校党建与思想教育,2022(19):71-74.

[8]汤苗苗,董美娟.高校课程思政建设存在的问题及对策[J].学校党建与思想教育,2020(22):54-55.

[9]吴加权.高校“双创”教育课程思政建设探析[J].学校党建与思想教育,2021(24):45-47.

[10]邓惠明,黄宝珍,黄文澜.从规范到超越:教师教育课程思政的有效实现[J].宁德师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2022(4):97-100.

[11]苏丽梅,李春忠.教师教育课程思政建设的价值意蕴与厚植路径[J].普洱学院学报,2022,38(3):97-99.

[12]郑洲.铸牢中华民族共同体意识视域下民族院校课程思政建设[J].民族学刊,2022,13(7):33-40.

[13]靳涌韬,刘春.教育学院课程思政建设路径及对策[J].大连大学学报,2022,43(2):34-38.

[14]范华凤,林云芸.地方高校教师教育专业课程思政的路径和方法[J].保山学院学报,2021,40(1):1-5.

[15]刘雨.师范类专业认证背景下教师教育课程思政建设路径[J].滁州学院学报,2021,23(6):100-104.

基本信息:

中图分类号:G651

引用信息:

[1]相虹,秦健超.“金课”视域下教师教育课程思政建设探索与实践[J].沈阳农业大学学报(社会科学版),2025,27(03):285-291.

基金信息:

云南省教育厅科学研究基金项目(2025J1053); 普洱学院教学成果培育项目(2023JXCGPYZD007)

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文